(tl;dr: This video is a lit-nerd treasure trove. WATCH IT NOW!)
HEY DAVE, WHAT THE CRAP IS A “NEWFIE”?: “Newfoundland” (pronounced “new-fin-land,” I learned the embarrassingly hard way) is that big ole island in the Atlantic alongside Canada. It’s kinda remote, Canadians hardly ever remember it exists, the weather isn’t great, and they sorta have an attitude (e.g., it’s nicknamed “The Rock”–you know, like the prison Alcatraz–and didn’t actually join Canada until 1950-ish, and then only because they needed the money.) The folks that live there are “Newfies”; they drink a cheap rum called “screech,” eat cod cheeks, and put 10,000-year-old chunks of glacial iceberg ice into tourists drinks, because it fizzes and impresses the hell out of tourists (thus making it easier to overcharge them). Also, quite beautiful country–on account folks don’t generally bother going there or messing with it much. In other words, it’s the Upper Peninsula of Canada. I like it quite a bit.
But for the purposes of this account, what matters is that they have a remarkably whack-ass accent, a crazy burring brogue that sounds like an Irish person ate a Scottish person, and then gave birth to a riding lawnmower. The lawnmower is the one talking in this example, and it’s insisting on telling you about how great their Healthcare system is and how dangerous is is to drive at night, on account of the moose. That’s basically every conversation I had with any Newfie: A lawnmower that works as a trucker, loves socialized medicine, and is really worried that because you are an American (and thus, implicitly, a dumbass) you are going to insist on driving at night and hit a moose (which, I guess, like to stand around on the highways at night because the blacktop stays nice and warm after the sun goes down).
HEY DAVE, WHAT THE CRAP IS THE “GLOBE THEATER” THIS VIDEO IS GOING ON ABOUT?: The Globe was Shakespeare’s theater–the one where he staged most of the plays throughout his career; he and his actors built it themselves after getting in a dispute with their landlord that culminated with them tearing down down the Theater (their previous HQ), carting the timbers off, and using them to frame the Globe (which, side note, is the best landlord-dispute resolution I’ve ever heard, and my whole damn family is in commercial real estate). The Globe burned down in 16-something, they rebuilt, and it burned down again after Shakespeare died (I’m glossing somewhat; a lot of this is foggy to me, because it’s been several decades since I was last asked to recount it using a number two pencil and a powder blue exam book).
At any rate, the Globe in the video was rebuilt in around 1994, just a few hundred feet from Shakespeare’s original Globe. This new Globe is dedicated to verisimilitude, which is pretty damn rad. They go out of their way to perform as Shakespeare’s actors would have, to use period-appropriate costumes (i.e., when they stage Julius Caesar, they dress as moderately educated Elizabethan Englishmen believed ancient Romans dressed), blocking, sets, hand props, and so on. Starting a few years ago, they expanded this to include period-appropriate pronunciations–so called “Original Pronunciation” (in contrast to the more popular modern “Received Pronunciation,” which my American readers probably think of as “BBC English” or “that stuck-up snooty-ass style British accent.”)
HEY DAVE, WHY ARE YOU TELLING ME ALL THIS?: Shakespeare and his Elizabethan actors apparently had the same accent as modern Newfies. That bawdy pirate going on about how, hour to hour, we ripe and ripe, then hour to hour we rot and rot? That is spot on *exactly* what every long-haul trucker I drank with in Newfoundland sounded like.
This Newfie sound really stands out at 3:17, with both the pronunciation of words like “War,” “harry,” “port,” “heels,” and “hounds,” but in the cadence. Also, check out some great (and very Newfie-like) dirty talk at around 8:00. For folks interested in the ins-and-outs of actually staging a play, there are some interesting bits around 7:00. I don’t know that folks who’ve never staged a play ever think about pacing, but it really is your central concern as a director/performer; pacing is what makes or breaks any performance, and it’s a failure to attend to pacing that tends to make student productions absolutely intolerable.
BONUS: Here’s another one from Ben Crystal (the younger dude in the above clip) where he takes a stab at explaining the mechanism whereby modern Newfies ended up talking like Elizabethan Londoners (FYI, I’ve heard a similarly argument made to explain why modern U.S. Appalachians use intransitive verbs–like “to learn”–in a transitive mode, just as Shakespeare and Donne did, despite it no=longer being considered grammatical in “proper” English).
The basic thrust of the premise: Folks who wound up being “transported” to the New World (i.e., sent against their will as punishment for largely petty crimes) came disproportionately from the streets of London, and *that’s* the language preserved in these Shakes scenes.
Again, lots of fun; this is one charming mutherfucker:
Author: dave-o
SPOILER ALERT: It’s a Parable about Global Climate Collapse
Cautionary tale: A parable of science fiction.
Yes, to a large chunk of folks it’ll be suitably obvious what Plait is driving at by about graff 3, but I still want to put this in front of folks because the piece is sturdy (if a touch tedious at moments, and clunking in the conclusion) and rhetorically useful. For those who are aware of climate collapse in a sort of background-noise way, it’s likely to be instructive.
Anyway, just to be super-duper clear: We are indeed already in the midst of an Extinction Level Event. I’m not saying that to be cynical or dramatic or to spur you to this action (or inaction) or that one; I’m saying it because it is factually the case.
For rather obvious reasons, it puts me into the mind of this song:
“Junkshop Percussion” in the Wild: Techno Goes Acoustic
I’ve been wrapping up my new book, which dedicates an entire section to “Junkshop Percussion”: washboards and cajons and spoons and buckets, and all the great “instruments” that are just detritus-plus-panache.
So, folks like this–who take a musical form that arose from digitization and mechanization via insanely expensive studio gear, then make it a dirt-cheap, no-tech, hands-on, all-acoustic expressive art form–just tickle me pink.
Like this guy, he’s a pure delight with the speed, steadiness, and raw sweat of that drum-n-bass:
Around the 2:15 mark this guy emulates a classic EMD filter sweep with his foot muting a bar; wünderbar!!!
Or check out the Pipe Guy’s PVC-and-flip-fop electro trance:
OMFG! I *love* old-school analog drum machine claps (like you get on a Roland 808, or my treasured Boss DR-110)–and he’s getting that sound from a goddamned flip-flop! *Outstanding!* I especially dig the point near 2:55, where dude launches into a cover of Iggy Azalea’s “Fancy”, then abruptly segues into the White Stripes’ “Seven Nation Army” (although I’m kinda disappointed that this never becomes a cover of the Knight Rider theme, ’cause it hovers right at the cusp of doing so).
There is a future where these dudes appear on a Skynet-hosted show called HUMANS GOT TALENT. Howie Mandel continues to host, because he is a cylon.
At any rate, more to the point: If you dig things like these dudes are doing, then you might dig my next book (out in July). If you can’t wait to start building instruments and making sweet-ass sounds, you can start *right now* with a free download of the two most popular music projects from my fist DIY book:
HELLA-RAD DEAL ALERT from @nostarch: Save 40% on maker books—#DIY toys, music, & electronics—until SUNDAY MAY 17

To celebrate the big Bay Area Maker Faire this weekend my publisher—No Starch Press—is offering a 40% discount on a fistful of their premier maker/DIY titles, including Arduino Workshop (which I’ve found *really* handy as I’ve been monkeying around with Arduino), The Maker’s Guide to the Zombie Apocalypse (!!!), The Manga Guide to Electricity (one of my son’s faves), and my books Snip, Burn, Solder, Shred: Seriously Geeky Stuff to Make with Your Kids and Junkyard Jam Band. As ever, any print purchase automatically includes DRM-free ebooks in ePub, .mobi/Kindle, and stunningly rad PDF formats. (FYI: If you buy Junkyard Jam Band—which goes to print this July—you’ll be signed up for the Early Access Program: Advance-reader copies of the projects will drop into your inbox as I complete layout review. It’s like an all-access pass to my bizarre, junkband fever dreams; video examples of prototypes after the jump.)
Wanna get in on the deal? Just toss the book (or books) in your cart and use the coupon code ELECTRICUKE at checkout—but strike while the iron is hot; this deal ends on SUNDAY MAY 17!
Your Mid-Afternoon Reminder that You *Will* Feel like an Asshole for Even Bothering to Try…
… ’cause the fact is, you’re mostly gonna fall on your face. Still, it’s better to be a loser than a spectator. Chins up, oh my Best Belovéd; we will defeat them one by one.
Prepare to Fall in Love with the HTML 5 Drum Machine
There’s a lot to love about the HTML5 Drum Machine. For starters, it’s all in HTML5, which means you can look at the source, monkey with it, and run it locally regardless of OS. On top of that, it apes a stripped down version of the venerable Roland 808 by default, with fairly faithful sounds (esp. the clap and rim, as well as those distinctively WtF?! “conga” sounds). Most importantly, it’s super easy to get your head around and use. Here’s a quick sample of a track a tossed together in roughly the amount of time it takes to listen to.
Yes, the response is a little sludgy (jeez, it’s browser based, for crissakes!), and it lacks some of the things I really love in Roland’s hardware drum machines (like the way the closed hat would clamp the decay on the open hat–’cause, you know, that’s how physical hi-hats work)–but, oh jeez, is this thing a ton of fun!
GO! Make a good noise here!
HTML5 Drum Machine
(via Free HTML 5 Drum Machine For Your Web Browser — Synthtopia )
MICHIGAN VOTERS: Our Roads Suck! Plz Vote YES on Prop 1!!!
Our roads are in crap condition and our legislators have basically been refusing to act like grown-ups and raise taxes to pay to fix them. So, they punted the decision to us with a moderately confusing ballot proposal–Proposal 1–to fund this. Here’s the bit: There’s now this growing grumble that we should torpedo the prop just to be dicks to the governor (who favors Prop 1).
This is a not-good plan. Our feelings about the governor are our feelings about the governor; failing to pass Prop 1 will not punish him. It will punish children, the elderly, and the poor. If you are pissed at *those* groups, then yeah, I guess you should kill Prop 1. Otherwise, vote YES on Prop 1, write an angry letter to the governor, and get on with your day.
Again, our legislators failed to act like grown ups and just fix the damn thing; the proper response is for us to act like responsible grown-ups, not to pitch a ballot-box tantrum.
UPSIDE OF PASSING PROP 1
- Our roads will get fixed, making them safer and saving *everyone* money on auto repairs, travel times, fuel consumption, etc.
- School funding will be protected.
- Taxes taxes will get somewhat more rational (gas taxes will go to fix roads, and several gas taxes will be repealed in order to replace them with a slightly higher single tax; sales tax will get bumped one point to 7%, in order to pay for public schools)
- The Earned-Income Tax credit will be restored (this helps low- to middle-income families)
DOWNSIDE OF PASSING PROP 1
- A governor who you maybe personally dislike is happy about something
- This is a net tax increase which disproportionately falls on the low- and middle-earners (which is just the reality of sales and fuel taxes)
Yeah, this is a crappy situation–even if you think the governor is dandy, it’s still an imperfect fix and and overall crappy situation, because it shows such weak, childish governing on the part of our elected officials–but it’s better than the alternative (as per Proposal 1: The issue that has turned too many Michigan progressives into tea partiers | Eclectablog):
We already know where they will find the money to put into the roads because they have been showing us for the past four years. They will cut programs that impact those in the most need – the elderly, the young, and the poor – and they will continue to cut education. In fact, conservative Senator Patrick Colbeck has an 83-bill package of legislation waiting in the wings in the event Prop 1 goes down in flames to begin these cuts.
So, on May 5, please VOTE YES ON PROP 1.
Continue reading “MICHIGAN VOTERS: Our Roads Suck! Plz Vote YES on Prop 1!!!”
Stop Beating Yourself Up for Not Being as Productive as Your Artistic Heroes
Nifty inforgraphics here based on data from Mason Currey’s significantly niftier Daily Rituals: How Artists Work.

One thing I really, really want to flag, though: Look carefully at the green “Day Job/Admin” bars. Fewer than half of the folks listed here (which are a very small sub-portion of the folks dealt with in the book, as I recall) have *any* time devoted to a day job. Those that do (Kurt Vonnegut, Wolfgang Mozart, and Sigmund Freud we’re specifically called out for “spending a good deal of their time working a separate day job,” even though Kafka seemed to have a more regular job than any of them) still only put in a half-day by modern American work standards.
Maybe you are like basically every artist I know: Someone who creates things, and also puts food on the table and keeps the lights on by selling his or her labor the old fashioned way. If that’s the case, and you are feeling down on yourself because you aren’t cranking out stories like O’Connor or Dickens, cut yourself some slack: You work for a fucking living.
Still feeling glum? Then take a second to imagine Vladimir Nabokov making cold calls trying to get folks to answer survey questions or Maya Angelou troubleshooting connectivity issues with the office’s wifi enabled printer.
Yeah, you, me, we aren’t writing Lolita, but Nabokov would run screaming from a half-day of what we do. Solidarity, brothers and sisters.
Early Access to More Projects from JUNKYARD JAM BAND!!!

Just a quick heads-up that we’ve added four new projects to the Junkyard Jam Band Early Access, for a total of *seven* fully-functional musical instrument projects you can download and build *now*–including the Droid Voicebox (learn to solder and then talk like a funky robot today), my new Playing-Card Pickup design (perfect for cigar-box guitars, diddley bows, steel-string ukes, mandolins, etc.), and the Elephant Trumpet (a couple bucks in parts, five minutes to build, hours of laughing yourself silly).
A: My new book, Junkyard Jam Band: DIY Musical Instruments and Noisemakers, won’t hit store shelves until this July. You can buy it at a discount *today* and get immediate access to PDFs of the projects. You’ll be updated as new projects become available, and ultimately receive your copy of the finished book before anyone else. ADDED BONUS (for both you and us): You have a chance to hit us with feedback about how we can make these projects *even more rad!*
Wanna jump aboard? Just add Junkyard Jam Band to your cart and checkout using the coupon code EARLYBIRD. You’ll save 30% and can start making a jazz noise ASAP.
Write Better: The Coyote, the Road Runner, Sympathy, and Craft as the Art of Constraint
Back at the beginning of March this list of Chuck Jones’s Rules for Coyote-Road Runner cartoons made the rounds:
(The pic, taken by filmmaker Amos Posner, shows a display in the Museum of the Moving Image’s “What’s Up, Doc? The Animation Art of Chuck Jones” exhibit. It’s identical to the Coyote-Road Runner Rules Jones listed in his 1999 memoir Chuck Amuck: The Life and Times of an Animated Cartoonist)
There’s some question as to the consistency with which The Rules are followed, as well as their pinned-to-the-wall workaday legitimacy, but as I work through a set of hard revisions on an almost-just-about-right SF novella, I’ve been thinking about these rules–not because I’m employing any of them in my edit (I’m not), but because they embody a different way of looking at constraints[*], and I’m very fond of drafting with a fuck-all attitude and revising with a sharp blade and very narrow constraints. By hewing to constraints we drive our work towards the Graceful Universality of fairytales, Willie Nelson songs, Basho haikus, Jones’ Coyote-Road Runner shorts, and the like. Besides, even if you miss the “graceful universality” bullseye, it’s effort well-spent, since the entire target constitutes “stuff someone will pay money for” (i.e., “work that meaningfully touches people”).
Jones’ Rules have been floating around the Internet for more than 15 years, during which time the list has swelled to as many as 11 items listed (in fact, Wikipedia editors only culled back to nine following Posner’s tweeted picture, even though Jones’ canonical nine-item Rules have been in print since 1999). Interestingly, the earliest instance of the Rules swelling beyond the Canonical Nine traces back to its *first* online incarnation back in 1999, which includes this 10th Rule:
(Rule 10.) The audience’s sympathy must remain with the Coyote.
This isn’t in Chuck’s Nine Rules because it’s something he explains a few pages earlier in his memoir, while setting up the discussion of the Coyote-Road Runner Rules. he returns to the idea in his analysis at the end of the book. It’s tacked on as a 10th Rule in that ancient webpage, but it’s really the 0th Rule, the fundamental Truth: The audience’s sympathy must remain with the Coyote, and to a greater or lesser degree the Rules guide the forward energy of each story toward this goal. The Coyote is humiliated not so much by an active antagonist (that damnable Road Runner) as by his environment, by the core physics of the universe, by shoddy consumer goods, and by his own mania.
You know, like the rest of us.
All of which is a nice reminder for me, that any part of the craft–all of the rules of thumb and editorial tricks and writing tactics and daily grinding–exist to serve the 0th Rule of the Coyote and Road Runner: You need to cultivate the audience’s sympathy for the protagonist. “Sympathetic” doesn’t mean “likable.” Likability, in my humble, is bullshit: We don’t “like” Richard III, on balance, or Hannibal Lecter, or Walter White, or Lady MacBeth, or Medea–but these are among the most compelling protagonists in Western narrative.
Similarly, “sympathy” isn’t “pity”; pity is a form of contempt. We feel superior to those we pity. But I don’t think most audience members ever feel superior to even the very disagreeable protagonists I’ve listed above, flawed and awful as they are. Why? I imagine it’s because, like Coyote, they may be failures, but they certainly aren’t quitters. We can respect that, and sympathy rests on a measure of (often grudging) respect.
Now there’s most certainly another 3k words I can put to this–especially as it applies to the modern argumentative essay and social media–but let’s stop here, with the nuts-and-bolts Write Better advice:
- Our job is to cultivate sympathy–not to be liked or pitied.
- We write better when we hew to constraints that guide our readers toward “feeling with” our characters (even the Bad Guys).
- There are many ways of formulating constraints; it doesn’t matter how they constrain you, so long as they do in fact constrain, that you at some point in your process feel hemmed in and annoyed by the Rules that you’ve set for yourself.
Or, in other words, accept the Fundamental Truth that Chuck Jones never deemed worth saying–that most artists come to see as so self-evident that it doesn’t bear mentioning:
You cannot catch or eat the Road Runner. But you always must chase.
*Amen.*